![]() Instituti Franciscani, 19671988), 5:2930 Ockham, Summa logicae, ed. William of Ockham, Summa logicaef in Opera philosophica et theologica ad fidem. Therefore consider now which seems the more probable to you. Ockham and Wyclif, at opposite poles in the ontology of universals, were treated. and division in his Summa logicae and Expositio super libros Een. Pdfmoduleversion 0.0. You see that I have set out opposing assertions in response to your question and I have touched on quite strong arguments in support of each position. Summa logicae by William, of Ockham, approximately 1285-approximately 1349. To decide by way of teaching, therefore, which assertion should be considered catholic, which heretical, chiefly pertains to theologians, the experts on divine scripture. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take his part out of the book of life and out of the holy city, and from these things that are written in this book." We clearly gather from all these that nothing should be added to sacred scripture nor anything removed from it. So viewed the development, discard, and rediscovery, of suppositio personalis becomes an intriguing episode in the history of logic and, as we will see, the appearance of Ockham's third Summa, the Elementarium, was poten- tially a pivotal point in that history. ![]() Contexto: The Holy Spirit through blessed John the evangelist makes a terrible threat against those who add anything to or take anything from divine scripture when he says in the last chapter of Revelations, "If any man shall add to these things, God shall add unto him the plagues which are in this book.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |